Citadels of Hate

The white-hating whites are quite fond of finding groups of whites who object to the extermination of the white man and labeling such groups as "hate groups." But I don't see any hate in these groups. The worst that one can say about some of them is that they don't make a very articulate case for their cause. But in all of these groups there is no hatred. There is love for their own and a desire to fight those who would attack their own, but there is no hatred.

In contrast, those who do the labeling are full of hatred. The white-hating whites cannot even say the word 'white' without spewing venom. They are maniacally obsessed with eliminating everything that has any connection to white civilization. And if that means exterminating every single member of the white race (with the exception of them), then so be it. The barbarian races of color do not talk about eliminating white power structures and institutional racism as the white-hating whites do. No, the colored hordes are much more direct. They make explicit what is implicit in the white-hating whites' ideology. They want to kill, in the grand Haitian style, every single white person on earth.

It is the maniacal, satanic hatred of white people that has been institutionalized in this country, and not, as the white-haters claim, white racism.

Let's look at the five citadels of power in our country.

1) The government.
In 1965, the Johnson administration shifted the immigration quota of Europeans to non-Europeans from 90% European to 10%. Is this a government committed to white supremacy? No, it is a government committed to the elimination of white people. Is there any candidate today who dares to call for the restriction of non-white immigration? To a large extent, the illegal immigration issue is a red herring, which doesn't mean we should not oppose it. But even without the presence of one single illegal immigrant, we would still be facing a crisis because of the government-sanctioned, legal invasion of our country.

And if we look at the government's successful efforts to destroy white culture through integration, can we draw any conclusion other than the obvious one? Our government has institutionalized the hatred of everything white.

2) The money men.
In a traditional society, the landed gentry are the most conservative members of society. They have a vested interest in the status quo. In such societies, George Gilder's entrepreneur is seen for what he is, a destroyer of hearth and home. When a nation's economy becomes a money economy, the result is always a "Deserted Village":

Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey,
Where wealth accumulates, and men decay

The landed gentry need a "bold peasantry" if they are to survive, while the capitalist needs soulless "steel girders" to survive. One of the modern age's greatest blasphemies is the coupling of 'capitalist' and 'conservative.' Barry Goldwater was as much a radical as George McGovern. Capitalism is dependent on soulless men, which is why the traditional European white man has been banned from the soulless utopia of the money men.

3) The press.
If an objective observer from another planet came down to learn about our culture by reading our newspapers and magazines, and viewing the mass media circus, he would give the following report:

"Their newspapers are written mainly by white earthlings, but they write predominantly about black earthlings. It seems that white earthlings feel that other white men in the past and most white men of the present, with the exception of the white earthlings who write newspaper articles, are very bad men who will do terrible things to the good black men if they, the white newsmen, do not keep a careful watch on them. The white newsmen are very vigilante and watchful. They are always exposing something they call 'racism.'

"The mass media (their viewing machines are much more primitive than ours) does much the same thing as the print media. They watch for signs of 'racism' and they constantly show pictures of the good black people at work and play. The black people seem particularly good at bouncing-ball sports, which earthlings seem to value highly.

"The most curious thing of all is that the 'good' black people do not behave in a way that we would describe as good. They do things that our society would call evil. But apparently earthlings have a value system that is quite different from the one we hold to.

Please allow me to come home now, for I am weary of this planet."

4) Academia.
It was recently revealed that the University of Delaware was issuing white-hating instructions to its students. However, the instructions were nothing new; that type of vicious hatred of the white race has been the reigning orthodoxy in academia for the last sixty years. And the draconian methods used to enforce the worship of blacks and the hatred of whites get meaner and more vicious every year. Teachers such as Nikki Giovanni of Virginia Tech who openly espouse the murder of "honkies" are given tenure, and black "student" groups are pampered and protected while white student groups are banned. And the classrooms? It doesn't matter what curriculum is studied, it is all the same, consisting of one central fact: black is good, and white is evil.

5) The clergy.
The present Pope, when he was still a cardinal, stated that the next pope should be black. The "Christian" evangelist James Dobson regularly applauds white people who adopt black children. And white priests and ministers encourage and sanction marriages between the races. But they need to go further. Should not one's liturgical expression of their faith be in line with their stated faith?

Based on what I hear the Christian clerics saying, I have been able to put together a service for them that is more in keeping with their stated creed than the ones they are using at present:

As we enter the Cathedral, we see, at the altar, a large statue of a Buddha-like black man. The parishioners, who are all white, come before the black Buddha statue and prostrate themselves before it. They kiss the feet of the statue and say three Mea Culpa's for their sins against the black race. Then they crawl to their pews. A white minister or priest (whatever you prefer to call him) comes out and leads the congregation in the litany and the creed. The litany is an encyclopedic catalog of whites' sins against the black race which takes up 15 pages in the prayer book and 45 minutes to go through.

Then, before the sermon, whites recite their creed: "I believe in the great black Buddha, creator of heaven and earth, and not in Jesus Christ, the miserable imposter god of my former racist days. I believe in the holiness of blackness, the evil of whiteness, and the everlasting goodness of blackness and the everlasting evil of whiteness, world without end, amen."

The sermon consists of some homely examples of how the gospel of blackness can be applied to everyday life. The minister describes how good children can report their parents when they use the "N" word at home or when their parents fail to gather the family around the hearth fire to recite the anti-white litany of the church. After all, one's faith should not be something that is only a once-a-week Sunday thing.

Every citadel of power in the United States and the Western world is dedicated to the hatred of the white race and the worship of the non-white races, particularly the black race. Why? What is so different about the white race that makes it a pariah race? The difference involves vision. It is only the European who can see through the outward material world to the real world behind the material façade. Only the European sees the puckish fairies on the green, the angels in the choir, and the Lord of history rising from the dead. There is no hosanna in colored barbarism or techno-barbarianism.

The white intellectual is in a headlong flight from his ancestor's vision of the empty tomb, because he doesn't believe it is empty. He stepped away from Christ and ventured out on his own. Now he is afraid of the dark and thinks science can replace Christ. The barbarian hordes share his hatred for the white race which took him out to a depth that he could not handle.

Every part of white civilization should be fought for. I never advocate Thomistic quietude, but should everything else be taken away, one thing will always remain with the European who refuses to abandon his white blood. And that is his vision of an earthly world that is rooted in heaven. The white man believed, and as a consequence he dreamt dreams and saw visions. The citadels of power are citadels of Satan. They bid us live in a desolate world devoid of everything that the white man used to revere. The European refuses to live in such a world. His world, the world of vision, is the real world. And yes, he will defend that vision against all the world, against the five citadels of power, and against all the forces of hell.

The European Rose

In a recent phone conversation with my father, he made the remark that he was sick of blacks screaming about discrimination. Now, this might seem like a rather mild protest to those of us on the Kinist right-wing, but it came as quite a shock to me because my father has been a good American liberal for his entire 80+ years on this earth. He never used the 'N' word in his life, he honors Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and he regularly worships black athletes. In fact it was the accusations of racism behind the shooting death of some black football player, by blacks, that finally elicited a protest from my father.

My father is not going to become a Kinist; he has not seen the light, but if my father is expressing mild indignation about the never-ending scolding of white people, then there must be a significant number of white people, not as liberal as my father, who are feeling something akin to rage. It would be a wonderful thing to see that rage turned into a counterrevolution, but that is not going to happen because 1) most of the enraged white people are disenfranchised, and 2) those who are not disenfranchised are afraid to reveal their anger lest they become disenfranchised.

Twice in the last week I have seen the words "wake up" used in reference to the colored invasion. The first instance was in a back issue (1979) of what the liberals would call a 'racist' publication. The magazine asserted in one article that white people were beginning to "wake up." And the second instance was when I heard Pat Buchanan call his new book on the immigration problem a "wake up call." Now, I have nothing against "wake-up call" books or magazine articles; they are helpful and necessary. But I think all the whites who can be awakened have already been awakened. And those whites include the fearful enfranchised whites who are afraid of being "outed" and the disenfranchised whites. What those whites need more than information about the colored invasion is empowerment. They need some means to fight back against the five citadels of power.

What is implicit in the "give them more information" books and articles is that white Europeans must look to some political candidate who supports the white Europeans' interests. But this is not an option for the white European. Let's look at the current presidential candidates. Only two candidates, Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo, are seriously against illegal immigration. And they are not even talking about stopping all non-white legal immigration and rebuilding a segregated nation. So a victory for Tancredo or Ron Paul would only be a tactical, delaying-type of victory; it would not even be a major first step in a successful counterrevolution. And this is the very best we can hope for if we follow the implicit advice of the "get out the information" publications. So we come back to the issue of empowerment. There are enough white people aware of and angry about the colored invasion to stop it if they had power, but they do not have any power. And until that fact changes, information books and articles will not help.

I think white people are doomed to the same fate as Sisyphus if they continue to look on politics as the key to empowerment rather than seeing it as the final denouement of a far greater power struggle. Regarding politics as a thing in and of itself is tantamount to seeing with and not through the proverbial eye.

Although it often seems that politicians are not born of mortal women but instead come straight from the bowels of hell, they are indeed mortal. Their beliefs are formed in the society in which they live. And once those beliefs are formed, they seek to impose those beliefs on others through political means. So the real source of power in a society is the institution or institutions that determine belief.

I would argue that there is only one institution in our society that determines belief, and that is the Academy. And what about the Church? There is no longer any Church; she has been absorbed by the Academy. Throughout Western man's history there has been a conflict between Athens and Jerusalem. Churchmen differed through the centuries over the compatibility of the two. They killed each other in disputes over the matter. But all is peaceful now because Athens has triumphed. Yes, we still have churches, but they only echo and rubber-stamp what the Academy says. Belief is determined by the Academy. And the Academy has determined that the older, Christian, European culture is evil.

A sizeable minority of disenfranchised working class whites and unemployed whites have not been completely converted by the Academy. They could become part of a white counterrevolution, but they are leaderless. The tiny minority of enfranchised white collar whites who do not share the beliefs of the Academy are the people who should lead the counterrevolution, but they remain in silent disagreement with the Academy lest they become disenfranchised themselves. And the ones who do speak out only recommend actions that are acceptable to the Academy, which places white people in the position of merely voting for a political candidate, such as Ron Paul, whose candidacy constitutes a rear-guard, delaying tactic to cover up a retreat, and not a full-scale counter attack.

A rear-guard, delaying action is noble; a retreating army needs men willing to be the rear guard. But it is suicidal to regard a rear-guard action as an offensive attack, and that is what we do when we place all our hopes in rear-guard political candidates. The political arena is a very narrowly focused arena. The Academy has triumphed, and it is not going to let anyone enter the arena who suggests policies that diverge too sharply from the political views of the Academy. There has been a successful revolution; it will take more than electoral victories to defeat the institutionalized forces of the revolution.

European civilization was built on the concept of church and hearth. Non-European societies had sacrificial altars and tribal dwellings; they did not have churches and hearths. But Satan made a covenant with the Uncle Silas's of the West and created an Academia Satania that has absorbed church and hearth. And the enraged, confused, disenfranchised, white man looks for a hero willing to strike back against the seemingly invincible dragon of Academia Satania.

The European Hero will be an intelligent man, but he will not be an intellectual. He will be a Christian, but he will not equate Christianity with one particular sect or one particular rite. He will be a man of blood and spirit. He will be spiritually in line with William Wallace and William Tell, but his people will not be just the Scottish people or just the Swiss people. His people will be white Europeans who do not worship the gods of the Academy.(1) The anti-white movement is an international movement, so the resistance will be an international movement as well.

The true European everyman's task is to remain loyal while waiting for the Hero. We must not become blasphemers and worshippers of the Golden Calf. It is not the U. S. Constitution, international law, or some economic system that sets the European apart from all other races. It is the hearth and church, sanctified by His blood, which sets the European apart. And that is what the Hero will fight for. And one hero will beget other heroes, and then we will once again see His blood upon the European rose.
__________________________________
(1) It seems to me that if our souls are in the proper state to recognize a true European hero, we will also be in a proper state to recognize The Hero.

The White Deer

You may lie
On sweet grass by a mountain stream to watch
The last wild eagle soar or the last raven
Cherish his brood within their rocky nest,
Or see, when mountain shadows first grow long,
The last enchanted white deer come to drink

--Donald Davidson

There is nothing a writer can do to explain what he has written to someone who deliberately wants to misconstrue what he has written. But sometimes, very rarely, people ask for explanations because they genuinely want an explanation. For those people I offer the following.

First, I have never claimed that the Christian Faith is only a white man’s religion. But I have claimed, and will continue to claim, that I do not believe that the Christian Faith has ever penetrated as deeply into the souls of other races as it has penetrated into the soul of the white race. The white Europeans were the only race of people who adopted Christianity as conquerors. They alone saw Christ as worthy of worship because He was gentle, meek, and kind as well as powerful. All the other races adopted Christianity after they had been conquered. They saw Him only as a God of power, not a God of love.

Secondly, I do not believe that because whites have abandoned their cultural heritage it would be a good thing if whites were supplanted by other more “vital races.” I want to see a renewal of the white race, not an extermination.

Thirdly, I take issue with “Christians” who adopt, with glee, the false formula that says, as the white race falls, other races shall rise. In reality, I think the equation reads: as the white race falls, so fall all other races. The idea that white Christian churches can export a new, pure, nonwhite Christianity to other cultures is ludicrous. The Church has not stopped exporting white Christianity to other non-white nations; it has simply stopped exporting healthy, integral Christianity and is instead exporting decadent, liberal Christianity under the guise of a purer, non-racist brand of Christianity.

The myth of the black, noble savage does an injustice to white folk because it implies that the extermination of the white race is a consummation devoutly to be wished. But we must reject that false myth and the much-anticipated (by liberal and conservative whites) invasion of the black Übermenschen. For Western culture is irreplaceable, and it provides the only link to a world that is not of this world. As Christopher Dawson writes:

“And the importance of these centuries of which I have been writing is not to be found in the external order they created or attempted to create, but in the internal change they brought about in the soul of Western man – a change which can never be entirely undone except by the total negation or destruction of Western man himself.”

And the worship of the black Übermenschen will result in the complete negation and destruction of Western man.

Are we, as Christians, obligated to prefer polyglot societies to white societies? The modern Christian says we are, and Brazil is often held up as a model country. But is there some divine intent behind the separation of the races? The fact that the races were separated by God and the fact of the Tower of Babel story seem to indicate to me that God did intend the races to be separate. But of course liberals reject the reality of the Tower of Babel. They must needs reject almost the entire Bible if they are to hold to their view of polyglot universalism because there is no biblical sanction for their hellish vision.

What the racial universalist misses is one of the most essential elements of Christianity. A key building block for the Faith is a love for kith and kin. One can only love the stranger when one has learned to love one’s own kith and kin. To short circuit the kith-and-kin system, which has worked well for thousands of years (why has the Faith diminished as more “enlightened” views of race have gained ascendancy in the churches?), and to replace it with a bloodless racial universalism will ultimately lead to the extinction of the Christian Faith. And we are almost to the point where one could say racial universalism has led to the extinction of the Faith. In the end if the racial universalists get their way, the Christian Faith will be like a preserved corpse: it will still retain its outward form, but there will be no blood in it.

The character of Ratty in The Wind and the Willows is able to appreciate Mole’s love for his home because he himself has such a love for his own river. There is much to be learned from Rat’s devotion to his river. In fact, my own devotion to European culture and to my own race has never been expressed better than by Ratty:

“I beg your pardon,” said the Mole, pulling himself together with an effort. “You must think me very rude; but all this is so new to me. So-this-is-a River!”
“The River,” corrected the Rat.
“And you really live by the river? What a jolly life!”
“By it and with it and on it and in it,” said the Rat. “It’s brother and sister to me, and aunts, and company and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It’s my world, and I don’t want any other. What it hasn’t got is not worth having, and what it doesn’t know is not worth knowing.”

A hopeless provincialism? No, it is a provincialism that leads to something much greater and more universal than the bloodless utopian universalism that is advocated by the Christian race mixers.

Addendum
Samuel Johnson was supposed to have claimed that patriotism was the last refuge of a scoundrel. I have often thought that mysticism is actually the last refuge of a scoundrel; after losing the debate, just get mystical with your opponent and tell him your argument defies rational constructions.

And yet although often the refuge of a scoundrel, there are mystical arguments that are valid and are not made because one is afraid of being challenged for one’s lack of empirical evidence and one’s lack of rationality. This is the reason many quite decent white “racists” often bring in false evolutionary theories to buttress up their case for the white race. They want something solid and empirical.

But the most compelling argument to me for the preservation of the white race, undiluted by other racial strains, lies not in the realm of evolutionary theory, which I do not believe in, but in the mystical realm.

In making my case for the white man, I am going to relate one example from what is a legion of examples. (And if you think a case for the white man need not be articulated, just listen to what is being said about him in all the citadels of ‘learned opinion’ throughout the world.)

When I worked as a police officer, there was another officer in a neighboring, urbanized borough whom we shall call Dave Mills (not his real name). Dave was a short, stocky, chain-smoking, overweight, fifty-one year-old veteran with over twenty-five years experience in police work. Dave was a white man. To the best of my knowledge, he never attended any church. Dave also, like the other white officers (and the black ones, too, for that matter) called black people ‘niggers.’ Dave was particularly anti-Negro, having been longer on the force than the rest of us.

Now, to the incident. Dave had finished his four p.m.-to-midnight shift and was heading back to his station. He was late because he had to finish up with a fender bender accident. On his way back to the station, he saw a congregation (not a religious one) of young black people. Two blacks in particular caught Dave’s attention, a boyfriend/girlfriend pair in their early twenties. The young black male was screaming at the young black woman, who appeared to be pregnant and was screaming back at the male. The screaming match was taking place on a bridge over a large stream. The stream was shallow enough and the bridge high enough to render someone quite dead if that someone were thrown off the bridge.

Dave’s first thought was to keep on driving – “Why get involved in some domestic dispute when I’m not even on duty? I’ll just tell the guys on the next shift to look into it.”

But Dave’s second thought, when he had driven about two blocks past the bridge, was “There might not be time for me to tell somebody else; that argument could turn violent.”

Dave returned to the bridge. When he got there he saw the same group of black youths as before, but the couple had gone beyond verbal confrontation; the black male had a knife to the woman’s throat and seemed to be trying to throw her off the bridge and/or slice her up.

Dave immediately called for assistance. And then he did something that is certainly not standard procedure but was something Dave often did because of his many years of experience. He unloaded his gun before getting out of the car. Why? Because Dave saw that he couldn’t shoot the assailant (the bullet might go through him and into the woman) and he also saw that he was going to have to grapple with a man decidedly younger and larger than he. If he lost the wrestling match, Dave knew he would be shot with his own gun. Yes, he could still be stabbed to death, but that, he reasoned, would take longer, and help (he hoped) was on the way.

I, being on the midnight-to-eight a.m. shift in a neighboring borough, and two other officers from Dave’s borough responded to Dave’s call for assistance. When we arrived, this fat, chain-smoking, politically incorrect, white male had the black male on his stomach (a black male with whom Dave could not have lasted one round in a boxing match) and was attempting to put handcuffs on him.

With help from the other officers and myself, Dave got the male cuffed. Dave was bleeding from knife wounds on his hands and arms. The woman was bleeding from wounds to the face, arms, and hands.

Dave called the ambulance for the woman and held her head in his arms till the ambulance came.

She recovered from her wounds and delivered her baby a few months later. Dave, whose wounds were minor, did not need to be hospitalized. He had undoubtedly saved the lives of the woman and her baby.

I have often pondered about that incident. Why did Dave bother going back to the bridge? He did not have to go back. No one would have faulted him for not looking into a non-incident. So why did he do it? There was a whole host of black youth who didn’t get involved, and who, in fact, were cheering for the assailant when I and the other officers arrived. So, again, why?

Well, I’m open to charges of mysticism at this point, but I must insist that the answer lies in the mystical realms. Dave, despite the fact that he was not a member of any Christian church and despite the fact that he probably had a rather hazy, nebulous idea about the Deity, was a blood Christian. Because he was a white man, he had the Faith which had been planted and nurtured in the blood of the white man some 1,500 years ago. That Faith can never be totally eradicated from the blood of the white man, and should never be diluted or supplanted by the blood of other races, even if they are actually Christian, or, as is more likely, if they merely call themselves Christian. The white blood is an essential support for Christianity. Without it there would still be Christian churches, but there would be no Faith left on earth.