That Which We Hold Dear

And Memory, Use, and Love make live
Us and our fields alike—

--Rudyard Kipling

In Arthur Koestler’s autobiography he told of a woman who had spent years as a devoted communist and then one day became an ardent anti-communist. Koestler, now a former communist himself, asked her why she had left the Party. She replied, “One night I heard screams.” Of course there had been nights and nights of screams, but one night the screams of one tortured soul penetrated the soul of a communist who thought there was no such thing as a soul. Such conversions were rare, Koestler went on to say, but they did occur.

Because “one night I heard screams” conversions sometimes occur, we should never stop trying to report the atrocities of the black barbarians. There is always the chance that an atrocity story will penetrate the soul of a liberal and he will be converted, but we cannot make the reporting of atrocity stories our only hope. In the main, the liberals have formed a protective shell around their hearts that makes them immune to an appeal for charity and mercy. Augustine once said that there was one deathbed conversion in Scripture, lest you despair; but there was only one lest you presume. We cannot hope for the equivalent of mass deathbed conversions from liberals as a result of getting the information out about black atrocities. What can we hope for then, in lieu of the conversion of the liberals? We can hope and work for the destruction of Negro worshipping Liberaldom.

In a centralized state such as the United States only a small minority of people are really committed to the preservation of the state. The vast majority of people are merely grazers; they go along with the powers that be, but if a different group took over the grazers would go along with them. The late John Tyndale, a British Nationalist, was well aware of the grazers. He once wrote an article explaining that more often than not he found that the British grazers agreed with him on the necessity of a white Britain, but they wouldn’t support him because they feared the loss of their jobs and the stigma of “racist.” Seize electoral power, Tyndale argued, and the grazers would go along with the new powers that be, the BNP. I agree with Tyndale about the grazers, but I don’t think you can defeat democratic, utopian liberalism from within utopia. You must destroy utopia and rebuild Christian Europe.

Behind Negro worshipping diversity is the desire to eliminate all that elevates a man to a spiritual plane above the nature-worshipping societies of antiquity. And the return to nature, which results in the worship of the savage, occurred in the European world when religious faith became a philosophy. When a man looks at religious faith philosophically he has already started the divorce proceedings between his heart and his head that will lead to the betrayal of his God and his people. He is a man fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils. Stanley Weyman, in his novel The Long Night, depicts a staunch and principled Switzer who betrays his people during their wars with Savoy because he succumbs to the philosophical temptation.

After all, a live dog is better than a dead lion – only you will not see it. We are ruled, the most of us, by our feelings, and die for our side without asking ourselves whether a single person would be a ducat the worse if the other side won. It is not philosophical, with another shrug. “That is all.”

Therein lies the key to the demise of the European. The devil bids us divorce ourselves from our people and our God in the name of a higher philosophical principle. In reality, an egotistical adherence to a “higher” philosophical principle, higher than “mere feelings,” leaves a man in a morally ambivalent state in which he can be easily manipulated by the devil.

This brings us to the necessity of concluding that the upholders of mere dialectic, whether they appear in this modern form or in another, are among the most subversive enemies of society and culture. They are attacking an ultimate source of cohesion in the interest of a doctrine which can issue only in nullity. It is no service to man to impugn his feeling about the world qua feeling. Feeling is the source of that healthful tension between man and what is – both objectively and subjectively. If man could be brought to believe that all feeling about the world is wrong, there would be nothing for him but collapse. -- Richard Weaver

The European has been brought to believe that all his feeling about the world is wrong, and he has indeed collapsed. The abstract philosophical poison, the European’s inheritance from Greece, killed the Roman Empire, and then in turn killed Christian Europe. It’s not hard to see why the Greek poison is so deadly, nor is it hard to see why men drink it so readily. The Greek philosophical poison consists of the “you shall be as God” liquid. If existence can be put in the silver rod of the philosopher, the philosopher can become God. It’s ironic that Plato, the most anti-European of the Greek philosophers, has been carried in the humanities curriculums of European universities for century after century. Plato’s cruel utopia, where the patriarchal family is outlawed, abortion is legal, and all ties of kith and kin are obliterated for the sake of the common good of an abstract humanity, was to become a shining light to anti-European intellectuals throughout the long history of Christian Europe.

Every utopia is antithetical to Christianity, even though many utopian schemes, in fact most utopian schemes, come from heretical Christians. Christianity celebrates the living God who saved individual human beings from sin and death. The utopian celebrates humanity in the abstract, which he plans to deliver from the pain of existence by virtue of the power of his mind. Such egomania always ends in oblivion, because individual human beings cannot live in the prison of the abstracted mind, abstracted from God and from man. The Roman Catholic priest, Jean Meslier, who rejected Christianity for his own abstract theology of utopia, at least had the decency to follow his abstract theory to its logical conclusion: After stating “I myself am not more than nothing…,” he committed suicide. The same fate has befallen the modern European people; believing they are nothing, a people without kith or kin, they are committing suicide.

All my life I’ve heard of the Greco-Roman heritage of Europe. And the unchallenged assumption is that the Greco-Roman heritage is good. But the type of heritage that liberals and conservatives are referring to, the Greek philosophical tradition and the Roman organization, have not been good for Europe. The discarded poetical heritage of Homer, Sophocles, and Virgil, the men who felt that there was a God beyond the gods, would have been a heritage for the Europeans to build upon, but it was not that heritage that became “our Greco-Roman heritage.”

Our Greco-Roman heritage is the heritage of the utopian Greek philosophers and the race-mixing Romans who put loyalty to the idea of Rome above loyalty to one’s blood. The startling fact that comes to the forefront when we look at the European’s history is that the classicists have always regarded the European as a barbarian because the European regarded the purity of his race as something sacred. I remember being shocked, because I had always been told the Europeans who invaded Rome were barbarians, when I first read about the real Europeans, such as Dietrich of Berne and Alaric the Goth, men of great heart and of a great civilization. They kept what was good in the Roman empire, the Christian faith, and discarded what was evil, the Roman policy of mongrelization in the name of Roman unity. It was the task of the European hero then, as it is his task now, to keep the Greco-Roman hell-hound at bay.

Right from the beginning then, there was a Greco-roman dagger aimed at the heart of European civilization. So long as the Europeans’ maintained their bloodlines, they were shielded from the Greco-Roman dagger. But when the shield of race was lowered the dagger of the Greek philosophic tradition and mongrelizing Rome was able to penetrate to the heart of the European civilization. In the purely material world a dagger to the heart is fatal, but in the real world, the world of the European fairy tales, a man and his people can survive a dagger to the heart; they can rise again, and ride triumphant over ruin and death.

Of course all talk of the European riding triumphant over anything is futile if he doesn’t recover his identity as a European. He is the Christ-bearer who preserved the faith by preserving the purity of his race. Whenever he wavered toward a Greco-Roman-philosophical utopia, his faith in the living God diminished. How could it be otherwise? Love, charity, and mercy stem from a living God, a God who is man and God; they cannot exist as philosophical abstractions or the “ethical ideals” of an organization dedicated to one-world, one-family, one-multicolored race.

The first European Christians viewed fidelity to their race as they viewed fidelity to their wife and fidelity to their God. The liberals accept that European vision of race and faith as the true Christianity, and then damn Christianity. The halfway-house Christians condemn the “racist” faith of the antique Europeans and point to a new Christianity where Christ appears, blesses Babylon, and then leaves the stage.

Can there be any faith in Christ outside the hearth fires of the condemned Europeans? The answer to that question is obvious to anyone who has a heart that still lives. The path through the European woods takes us to Him; the path through the new improved woods of the liberals leads to Babylon, and beyond that, hell. I have no desire to be wiser than my ancestors. They knew and loved God because of His divine humanity. They saw the human in the divine, because they were faithful to a particular race of people, not a philosophical utopia or a multi-racial organization. The European cottage in the woods, when inhabited by men and women of our own race, is infinitely more beautiful than the gaudy palaces of Babylon peopled by an indeterminate race of subhuman monstrosities. In the former dwelling we see the face of Christ reflected in his people; in the latter we see only darkness. We’ve truly lost our way if we prefer the Babylonian palace to the European cottage. +

The Trumpet Shall Sound

The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light; and they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them the light shined. – Isaiah 9:2

I once read an account, which I have no reason to doubt since his work verifies the account, about something that happened while Georg Friedrich Handel was composing The Messiah. He had locked himself in his study for several days and his friends and family were worried. What had happened to him? Was he ever coming out? Finally his friends decided that they had to risk disturbing him, so they pounded on the door and demanded that he come out of his study. Handel came out. His hair was disheveled and his eyes shown with a special light. He looked at his friends and finally, as he comprehended their presence, he said, “I have seen the face of God.” Can anyone listen to The Messiah and doubt that Handel did indeed see the face of God?

And I would ask one additional question. Can anyone look at the heart of pre-modern European culture, the culture that nurtured men like Friedrich Handel, and doubt that we see the face of Jesus Christ imprinted on that culture? The liberals certainly see Christ in the culture of the antique European and that is why they denounce the antique European culture; they hate the Son of God. The halfway-house Christians? They denounce the vision of Christ seen in Handel’s Messiah, claiming it is a distorted vision of Christ, but they maintain the right to refashion the Christ of Handel’s Messiah into a Christ more conformable to modern liberalism. Handel’s “King of Kings” vision of Christ has given way to the anti-apartheid, integrationist, civil rights worker Christ, who is quite content to work in the background of the civil rights movement, which is of course, the Negro-worshipping movement, and to lick envelopes and send out letters for feminist candidates, who are legion.

The Renaissance poets and painters often brought the old pagan gods into their works, but the pagan gods were no longer real to the Europeans; they were used to symbolize some aspect of the Christian faith, which had supplanted them. It might seem like a sad fate for a god, to become merely a symbol for another religion, but the pagan gods could not satisfy the longing in the European’s heart. He needed a Hero-God who was a hero because of His humanity. Christ was like unto men, but He was more than men, not by virtue of His inhumanity but by virtue of His humanity. He was strong yet meek, and He was just yet merciful. And above all His heart was aflame with the charity that passeth all understanding, at least the understanding of the human mind; European hearts did understand and believe.

Handel’s Messiah is just one of many testaments to the European peoples’ Christian faith. For centuries the European King of Kings was Jesus Christ. It was not so with the colored tribes. They never formed an attachment to the Man of Sorrows. Their desire for a cruel god of blood and sacrifice kept them from a deep understanding of the Christian faith, but now in this, the 21^st century since our Savior’s birth, death, and resurrection from the dead, the European has severed his ties to Jesus Christ. Our Lord has become a dead-letter god to the modern Europeans just as Thor and Zeus became dead-letter gods to the antique Europeans. Why has He been dethroned, and who has supplanted Him? He was dethroned because of the intellectual pride of the European, and He was supplanted by the Negro.

After Christ was dethroned as Europe’s King of Kings, the Negro did not immediately become the new king of the white man. It was many years after Christ’s dethronement that the Negro became lord of Europe, because such great spiritual upheavals do not take place in a day, but ultimately the worship of the Negro is the logical consequence of the intellectual pride of the white man. When Handel’s Christianity was seen as too stupid, too repressive, and too difficult for the European, he created his own natural religion in which he, the white intellectual, remade God into the image of a natural savage, the Negro.

Of course many of the progenitors of the natural religion, such as Darwin and the Scholastics, did not envision that the Negro would be the endpoint of their natural religion, but when you confine man within the natural process and deny him a life outside that natural process, it is inevitable that you will declare the most savage of men to be the most natural and therefore the most holy of men. It was the more visionary of the white-hating Europeans, such as Rousseau, Dryden, Voltaire, and Addison, who saw in advance that the new god would have to be the Negro. The scientific Darwinists and the followers of the scholastic naturalists did not fall in line with the consequences of their progenitors’ abstractions until the 20^th century.

If you take the church road, you will end up in Babylon, and if you go by way of the school road, you will also end up in Babylon. In Liberaldom all roads lead to Babylon, where the Negro is worshipped and the white Christian is considered to be a pariah who must be driven off the face of the earth. And the white man will be driven off the face of the earth if he believes that he deserves to perish because he polluted the world with a vision of the God of love and mercy depicted by Handel in The Messiah. It sounds absurd when it’s stated outright, that the white man should be exterminated for being the Christ-bearer, but this is what all the liberal blather about white racism amounts to – the European championed the Christian faith; he told the dark races that the true God required mercy, not sacrifice, and he had the audacity to proclaim that his culture, with Christ at its center, was superior to all other cultures. No amount of white mea culpas to the colored races or the rulers of Liberaldom will absolve the white man’s original sin, the sin of making common cause with Jesus of Nazareth against the colored tribes of Babylon. As long as the modern Europeans feel they must be punished for their racist past, they will continue to try to save themselves by sacrificing other whites – it is always other whites – while inching ever closer to their own annihilation. And they might as well be annihilated if they truly believe that the darkness of Babylon is superior to the light of His Europe, because the people who believe such a blasphemy are already dead inside.

When Europeans such as Jules Verne and Rudyard Kipling wrote stories that took place in the future, they always depicted a Europe inhabited by white men. They never dreamt in their wildest fantasies that a time would come when Europe would be filled with colored barbarians, and the white man’s love of his own God to the exclusion of all other gods and the white man’s love of his own kith and kin would be called “white supremacy,” a crime punishable by death. But such a time has come.

Trust not in churches. In every denomination, the treason is the same. The churches deny the validity of the Europeans’ union with Christ and present their union with the kingdom of Babylon, with the Negro on the throne, as the true Christianity. Any attempt to criticize Babylon or praise Christian Europe is treated as the sin of white supremacy, which (as we have already shown) is viewed by all the lords of Liberaldom as the unpardonable sin.

The dead-ember culture of Liberaldom provides no spiritual warmth for any living soul. It is truly a kingdom of dead souls. No European has to live in such a kingdom. The God who rose from the dead on the third day is capable of sustaining His own people in the Kingdom of the dead and raising them at the last trump. Only a European without a heart would fail to weep at the sight of Babylonian Europe. But if a European has the heart to weep for Europe he will also have the heart to fight for Christian Europe. I loved the way Thomas Nelson Page described the heroic European:

“He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart – a Goth.”

When – and it is not written – the European stops running from the racist police of Liberaldom and starts to fight, “true to his instincts… loving and hating with all his heart,” Liberaldom will start to crumble, and Handel’s hosanna to the King of Kings will overwhelm the liberals’ paean to the colored gods. And that is how it should be, because Jesus Christ is the lawful King of Europe and the Lord of Lords. +

In the Face of the Whirlwind

And he said unto me, son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord God, thou knowest.
– Ezekiel 37: 3

“Throw our paper platforms, preambles and resolutions, guaranties and constitutions, into the fire, and we should be none the worse off, provided we retained our institutions – and the necessities that begot, and have, so far, continued them.”

Fitzhugh makes the point that it is the unwritten traditions of a people that determine what they are, not the paper-and-ink nonsense called constitutions. A constitution is no better or worse than the people who are interpreting it. In our own anti-nation, for instance, the diabolists on the Supreme Court discovered, in 1973, that the crime of infanticide was a constitutional right. That constitutional right was not proclaimed because wise men finally discovered the real meaning of the constitution. It was proclaimed because the unwritten traditions, which were based on the Christian faith of the European people, were altered. And if we go back further and look at the precursor of infanticide, namely race-mixing, we can see the Supreme Court in Brown v. Topeka reversing the older Supreme Court ruling (Plessy v. Ferguson) against race-mixing, to a ruling in favor of race-mixing. European Americans had changed their faith and the traditions based on that faith so they changed their interpretation of the Constitution.

Liberal-conservatives can blather from now to doomsday about electing men who will appoint judges who are “strict constructionists,” but they will accomplish nothing even if they succeed in their goal. The traditions of our nation have changed; there will be no restoration until there is a traditional counter-revolution, and counter-revolutions (like revolutions) first take place in the human heart. When Europeans repudiate liberalism in their hearts they will naturally seek to destroy the traditions and laws that are the result of liberalism. They won’t need a guidebook or an intellectual guru to tell them how to proceed against the liberals; they will know what has to be done.

Of course it is not written that the Europeans will ever desire to restore their deserted European villages, but if Europe is restored it will be restored because hearts that were dead came alive again. It’s not a question of optimism or pessimism. In the realm of the spirit those arbitrary categories don’t exist. It would be ignoring reality to deny that the European people in the main are behaving like the swine in the Gospel. But it would also be unrealistic to think because the Europeans seem, at present, to be dead to the life of the spirit that they will continue in the same vein until their ultimate extinction. Things of the spirit are not subject to the “2 + 2 = 4” rules of the material world. There could be, even in our modern Babylon, some European hearts that are not spiritually dead, and those hearts could form first a crack, then a fissure in the concrete, soulless world of Liberaldom. Nothing is written.

I didn’t vote in the last Presidential election because Obama was a soul-dead, brain-dead stooge of the liberals, and McCain couldn’t have been more obviously a spawn of Satan if he had sported the sign of the beast on his forehead. I would have voted for just about any other Republican candidate if the Republicans had had the sense to run someone besides the devil man, but I would not have voted for a Republican candidate with any hope that my vote was helping to restore the European people. How could a European hope for that result by voting in liberal-sponsored elections? There was no Republican candidate campaigning for white Europeans. I saw no banners proclaiming that Europe should belong to Europeans and that Christ should reign instead of Satan. No, there is nothing for the European within the confines of liberal democracy. A vote for a liberal-conservative candidate is simply a vote for a rearguard delaying action. It is to be hoped that a liberal-conservative will implement liberalism at a slower pace, but an antique European should never place his hopes in elections. “Trust not in princes.”

Everything for good or ill that the European does can be traced to his Christian roots. When he does ill, it is because he has bastardized the Christian faith of his forefathers. And the good he used to do was done because he lived and breathed what David Balfour called “the good Christianity.” Without the good Christianity, the European is a willow reed that blows whichever way Satan wishes him to blow.

One of the many things I learned from Walter Scott was that the people within a nation should be judged by what and whom they honor. In Scott’s Europe the Christian gentleman who was fierce in defense of the innocent and charitable to the poor and helpless was honored. The mother who stayed by the hearth fire and nursed and reared her children was honored. And Christ, from whom all the virtues flowed, was honored.

In contrast to Scott’s Europe, we have modern Babylonian Europe. The Christian gentlemen is now called a sexist; the Christian housewife is now designated as a repressed, stifled, and repulsive woman; and Christ is only accorded a secondary place of honor in support of the primary black gods of our Babylonian world.

The Marines’ Hymn, sung today, strikes me as blasphemous: “Keeping our honor clean.” What honor? The only honor left a Christian European is the honor of facing and defying the liberal Leviathan. There is only dishonor in fighting and defending Babylon.

In Kipling’s story “The Man Who Would Be King” Daniel Dravot’s only concern, when he is facing certain death at the hands of thousands of murdering savages, is that his friend, whom he has wronged, will forgive him. When he gets that forgiveness, he feels that everything is all right, and he tells the heathens to “Cut you, beggars, cut!” The bastard Europeans and their heathen allies don’t matter. Our only concern should be that we don’t dishonor Him, the Christ, and them, our ancestors.

Europeans have gone from being the first fully human people to being the first non-existent people. Blake’s The Book of Thel is a pre-existence myth; the European is living (if you can call non-existence ‘living’) through a post-existence myth. Think about it. If a man has no ties to a particular race, family, or religion, can it be said that he exists?

The liberal’s solution to the non-existence that he has created for himself is to lap the blood of the colored tribes in the hopes that he will feel something, anything, that will stave off the feeling of nothingness he lives with. I’ve spent more of my life in academia than is good for a person to spend there. And I saw, in academia, the non-existent Europeans up close. I recall one professor, one of a legion of such non-existent Europeans, of the homosexual persuasion who could only be aroused by young men of color. And that professor’s sick fantasy forms the basis of the liberals’ civilization. Race-mixing and sexual perversion are the cornerstones of Liberaldom.

In Scott’s Europe the man who saw beauty in virtue and ugliness in vice was the Everyman of Europe. The decadent liberal who needed the opiate of illicit, interracial sex and saw beauty only in vice was on the outer fringes of society and had to, in order to survive, ape the ways of the virtuous and indulge his vices in secret. Now that the virtues of Scott’s Europe have been proscribed and the sins of the decadent avant-garde have been declared virtues the antique European is an outlawed man. But it is better to be an outlawed man than a non-existent man. Rather than drift with the satanic winds, the antique European stands in front of the satanic whirlwinds and refuses to yield, confident that his God will sustain him.

There is a powerful scene in the book of Ezekiel in which the Prophet Ezekiel sees the Lord bring life to dry bones:

So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army. – Ezekiel 37: 10

And the vision of dry bones being raised to life is repeated by St. John in the book of Revelation:

And after three days and an half the spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. – Revelation 11: 11

Liberaldom is the valley of dry bones, the dry bones of the science lab and the sacrificial altars of the savage tribes of color. The culture of dry bones restored to life is the antique European culture. When we passed from the European culture to Liberaldom we went from light to darkness. Every step backward toward Babylon was proclaimed to be a journey toward the light, but how can dry bones produce light? Light comes from God and the people animated by the spirit of God. When Liberaldom is dust, eternal Europe, built on St. Paul’s affirmation of faith, “But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the first fruits of them that slept,” will still be standing. +

The Fearful Dark Night of Europe

And hope is brightest when it dawns from fears
-- Scott

Paul Craig Roberts, who writes insightful articles on the subject of economics, recently wrote his final column, titled “Truth Has Fallen and Taken Liberty With It.”

For the last six years I have been banned from the ‘mainstream media.’ My last column in the New York Times appeared in January, 2004, coauthored with Democratic U. S. Senator Charles Schumer representing New York. We addressed the offshoring of U. S. Jobs. Our op-ed article produced a conference at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D. C. and live coverage by C-Span. A debate was launched. No such thing could happen today.

For years I was a mainstay at the Washington Times, producing credibility for the Moonie newspaper as a Business Week columnist, former Wall Street Journal editor, and former Assistant Secretary of the U. S. Treasury. But when I began criticizing Bush’s wars of aggression, the order came down to Mary Lou Forbes to cancel my column.

The American corporate media does not serve the truth. It serves the government and the interest groups that empower the government...

The militarism of the U. S. and Israeli states, and Wall Street and corporate greed, will now run their course. As the pen is censored and its might extinguished, I am signing off.

Roberts was absolutely correct in his criticism of Bush’s wars of aggression, but I wonder where he has been living for the last forty years if he thinks it is only in the last six years that speaking the truth has been forbidden. The liberals have become more draconian now that their power is total, but long before Paul Craig Roberts was banned from the mainstream media the truth was banned. If Mr. Roberts had tried, from the 1960’s onward, to write articles in defense of segregation and against race-mixing, he would have found his articles banned from the mainstream media. Truth be told when conservatives agreed to go along with the race-mixing movement, called the ‘civil rights’ movement, they were doomed to lose on every other issue, such as legalized abortion, economics, and war.

If you look at the world from an antique European perspective, it is perfectly clear why the white man’s refusal to defend his race led to legalized abortions, wars of aggression, and unsound economic policies. Outside of Christian Europe was there ever a nation concerned with the proper ordering of their economy, the justice of their wars, or the plight of the defenseless baby in the womb? If Paul Craig Roberts had had the same respect for the truth that race-mixing leads to the destruction of white civilization as he had for the truth that bad wars and bad economics equal disaster, he might have foreseen that the same people who deny the sinfulness and folly of race-mixing are the same people who are going to deny the truth of Paul Craig Roberts’ criticism of wars of aggression and unsound economic policies. Old Neville Chamberlain’s name has become synonymous with cowardly appeasement, but where is the greater appeasement to be found? At least Chamberlain sold out to other white people. Our modern liberals and their scared-rabbit 'Christian' lackeys sold out their own people to the colored barbarians.

It’s a question of “when our grace we have once forgot.” Once a man makes the first betrayal, the betrayal of his race, the second, third, and fourth betrayals will follow. One man might show more concern for the abortion betrayal, another for the economic betrayal, but every subsequent betrayal stems from the white man’s initial betrayal of his race.

The neo-pagans tell us that Christianity is responsible for the great betrayal, but that view contradicts the historical evidence. The white man’s love for his race was greatest when his faith in the risen Lord was greatest. The betrayal came when the European ceased to love his God with his whole heart and with his whole soul. When Christianity is seen as a cafeteria, where a person may take only what appeals to him and leave everything else, it becomes a demonic faith. Liberals worship Satan, not Christ, so they take an isolated part of Christianity and make it part of a satanic brew. Thus Christ’s call for salvation for all who believe is perverted into a satanic demand for one universal, godless race of bestial human beings. And such beasts do not care about just wars, sound economics, or the innocent unborn. That’s why Babylonian universalism is the first step on the road to Satania.

And now that there is only one road and that road leads to Satania, what is an antique European supposed to do? Should he just sign off? No, because the antique European was never on the road to Satania. The conservative-liberals should sign off; they’ve been working within Satania, accepting its basic premises, while trying to make slight alterations within the satanic household. The Christian European lives outside Satania; he is at war; he can’t sign off; he can only surrender, and that he refuses to do.

Adam and Eve broke their filial ties to God the Father because they thought Satan offered them something better. They were going to obtain forbidden knowledge that would make them the equal of God. We know how that turned out. The modern Europeans have repeated the original sin. They think they have obtained a knowledge greater than God’s, because God’s plan for man’s salvation was racist and provincial, but they have only rediscovered the plan of God’s ancient foe, the plan for the damnation of the human race. We have descended to such a low depth that we no longer have to use our imaginations to visualize hell; we can see it right in front of us in the black-infested urban centers of America and Europe and in the ruins of such countries as South Africa and Rhodesia.

The conservative-liberals always cry foul when the mad-dog liberals depict them as evil for voting Republican or for voting against amnesty. “Why demonize us; we just differ on the means to an end; we don’t differ on the end, which is democratic Babylon.”

The mad-dogs have grasped something that the pragmatic conservative-liberals have failed to grasp. It is a religious war; they should demonize their enemies. Where the mad-dogs err is in demonizing their fellow travelers, the conservative-liberals. The mad-dog liberal’s enemy is the white European. The conservative-liberal is sometimes mistaken for one, not by the white European, but by the mad-dog liberal.

The mad-dog liberals see that it is a religious war in which we are engaged. And it is we, the white Europeans, whom they want to eradicate from the face of the earth. Such satanic hatred is a fearful thing to face. But St. John tells us that “perfect love casteth out fear.” That is the trouble with the halfway house Christians and the conservative purveyors of statistical doom. They do not love the ancient Europeans and their civilization enough. They talk about church documents, the ‘born again’ experience, free markets, and some abstract concept of liberty that was supposedly invented by the Americans, but they don’t talk about old Europe and Europe’s people like Ratty talked about his river, with reverence, awe, and love:

`I beg your pardon,' said the Mole, pulling himself together with an effort. `You must think me very rude; but all this is so new to me. So--this--is--a--River!'

`THE River,' corrected the Rat.

`And you really live by the river? What a jolly life!'

`By it and with it and on it and in it,' said the Rat. `It's brother and sister to me, and aunts, and company, and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It's my world, and I don't want any other. What it hasn't got is not worth having, and what it doesn't know is not worth knowing.

It is by no means certain that the European will ever be a European again. It is certain, however, that if the European once again loves His Europe no force on earth will stand against him. +

"When I was a child, I spake as a child..."

“Keep the imagination sane,-- that is one of the truest conditions of communion with heaven.” – Nathaniel Hawthorne

When still young and new to the right-wing European movement, I formed a rather uncritical admiration for the old guard intellectuals of that movement. The poets of Europe had brought me to the foot of the cross, but it was to the old guardsmen I turned for an articulation of the Christian faith. When I explained the faith to others, I parroted the old guard. This is quite natural for a young whippersnapper, but as one becomes a man one must make sure he believes what he parrots. In my case, I realized I differed with the old guard on two important points, both relating to Europe.

1. I differed with them on the issue of race. The old guardsmen were fond of saying that a defense of Western culture had nothing to do with a defense of the white race. (Only men who spent their lives in academia could every say anything so stupid.)

A defense of the West cannot be done without a defense of the white race. Whites are not superior because the evolutionary process made them so (as the neo-pagans maintain), but because they made the one true religion their own. And just as original sin was passed on through the blood, so the European peoples’ free will choice of Christ over Satan was passed on through the blood. Just as one can counter the bad effects of original sin by clinging to Christ, so can one counter the good effects of the white man’s acceptance of Christ by rejecting Him. And the vast majority of whites have rejected Christ. That makes it all the more urgent that we support the faithful white remnant. To praise European culture without praising and defending the white man is Gnostic nonsense.

2. The old guard failed to appreciate how distinct the European tradition was from the classical tradition. Chaucer, Shakespeare, Botticelli, and countless other European writers and artists choose Greco-Roman themes for their works, but what they did with them was something very different from the Greco-Romans’ renditions. Everything is deeper when the Christian poets and artists deal with the pagan themes. In Midsummer’s Night’s Dream, Theseus becomes a Christian king, highlighting charity as the greatest virtue:

I will hear that play;
For never anything can be amiss,
When simpleness and duty tender it.
Go, bring them in; and take your places, ladies.

In Chaucer’s The Knight’s Tale, Jove becomes a symbol for the Christian God. And in Botticelli’s painting of The Birth of Venus, the goddess of illicit love becomes a virginal Christian maiden.

The excessive reliance on the classical tradition was, in my judgment, the major reason for the collapse of the Protestant and Catholic churches. And the traditionalists think we need a classical revival! We need a European revival, not a classical one. The classical temptation, which would make Christianity into a philosophical system, is potentially more dangerous than the atheistic temptation. I have noticed there has been a score of books published in the last 10 years, such as Who Killed Homer? by Hanson and Heath, This Will Hurt: The Restoration of Virtue by Digby Anderson, and Plagues of the Mind by Bruce Thornton, in which the authors suggest we rebuild civilization on the classical tradition and bypass the European Christian tradition. This might appeal to those who like the simplicity of the classical era, but there is no going back. The choice is either 'be Christian, or perish.'

The old guard did not understand Europe. If they had, they would not have abandoned the white man’s burden or slept so contently with Aristotle and Plato.

When I reflect on the weaknesses of the old guard (those men of the World War II generation) I realize that they were the last of the Christian rationalists, who still believed that the dying flame of the European fire could be reignited by the cool waters of rationalism. They were doctors who completely misdiagnosed their patient. The patient needed more warmth, and they sat him out on the veranda in sub-zero weather.

Christ set Europe on fire with a poetic drama which He authored and starred in, a passion play meant to appeal to the heart and the head. He did not intend that His life, death, and resurrection should be treated as the literary critics treat a Shakespearean drama, poking, probing, and dissecting the play with only their minds, leaving their hearts outside. But if the poet writes with his heart and mind, how can the literary critic understand him if he doesn’t respond to the play with the same fire that the author used to write the play? And how can we respond to Christ’s passion play if we have no passion?

Plato banned poets from his Republic because he thought the passionate, poetic side of man was dangerous. The old guard followed the wisdom of Plato, but the passionate, imaginative, poetic heart of man, when joined with the heart of the Divine Poet, is the only force capable of reigniting the European fire.

I once read a book by one of the conservative education ‘experts’; he felt that the problem with modern liberal education was that it was not value-free. He recommended a ‘just the facts’ program of education that sounded much like the program recommended by Thomas Gradgrind in Dicken’s Hard Times:

Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!

The conservative education expert was wrong. The problem with liberals is not that they teach values in school -- values should be taught in school -- the problem is that they teach liberal values. And likewise the old guard; the problem is not with the poetic and imaginative side of the European’s nature; the problem is that the European has ceased to view Christianity as a faith that inspires and stirs the imagination. The European has come to believe what the old guard told him about Christianity: “It is charts, diagrams, syllogisms, and not much else.” But man will have the poetic. If he is denied a Christian poetic, he will adopt a satanic one. Obama is the new Messiah, because the old guard thought a remote, bloodless, philosophical God was good enough for the rational, modern man of Europe. Such a God is not good enough. The real Hero-God (He was not invented), who inspired the ancient Europeans is more than good enough, and it is to Him that we should look if we want to see Christendom restored and liberaldom destroyed.