The Fearful Dark Night of Europe
And hope is brightest when it dawns from fears
Paul Craig Roberts, who writes insightful articles on the subject of economics, recently wrote his final column, titled “Truth Has Fallen and Taken Liberty With It.”
For the last six years I have been banned from the ‘mainstream media.’ My last column in the New York Times appeared in January, 2004, coauthored with Democratic U. S. Senator Charles Schumer representing New York. We addressed the offshoring of U. S. Jobs. Our op-ed article produced a conference at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D. C. and live coverage by C-Span. A debate was launched. No such thing could happen today.Roberts was absolutely correct in his criticism of Bush’s wars of aggression, but I wonder where he has been living for the last forty years if he thinks it is only in the last six years that speaking the truth has been forbidden. The liberals have become more draconian now that their power is total, but long before Paul Craig Roberts was banned from the mainstream media the truth was banned. If Mr. Roberts had tried, from the 1960’s onward, to write articles in defense of segregation and against race-mixing, he would have found his articles banned from the mainstream media. Truth be told when conservatives agreed to go along with the race-mixing movement, called the ‘civil rights’ movement, they were doomed to lose on every other issue, such as legalized abortion, economics, and war.
For years I was a mainstay at the Washington Times, producing credibility for the Moonie newspaper as a Business Week columnist, former Wall Street Journal editor, and former Assistant Secretary of the U. S. Treasury. But when I began criticizing Bush’s wars of aggression, the order came down to Mary Lou Forbes to cancel my column.
The American corporate media does not serve the truth. It serves the government and the interest groups that empower the government...
The militarism of the U. S. and Israeli states, and Wall Street and corporate greed, will now run their course. As the pen is censored and its might extinguished, I am signing off.
If you look at the world from an antique European perspective, it is perfectly clear why the white man’s refusal to defend his race led to legalized abortions, wars of aggression, and unsound economic policies. Outside of Christian Europe was there ever a nation concerned with the proper ordering of their economy, the justice of their wars, or the plight of the defenseless baby in the womb? If Paul Craig Roberts had had the same respect for the truth that race-mixing leads to the destruction of white civilization as he had for the truth that bad wars and bad economics equal disaster, he might have foreseen that the same people who deny the sinfulness and folly of race-mixing are the same people who are going to deny the truth of Paul Craig Roberts’ criticism of wars of aggression and unsound economic policies. Old Neville Chamberlain’s name has become synonymous with cowardly appeasement, but where is the greater appeasement to be found? At least Chamberlain sold out to other white people. Our modern liberals and their scared-rabbit 'Christian' lackeys sold out their own people to the colored barbarians.
It’s a question of “when our grace we have once forgot.” Once a man makes the first betrayal, the betrayal of his race, the second, third, and fourth betrayals will follow. One man might show more concern for the abortion betrayal, another for the economic betrayal, but every subsequent betrayal stems from the white man’s initial betrayal of his race.
The neo-pagans tell us that Christianity is responsible for the great betrayal, but that view contradicts the historical evidence. The white man’s love for his race was greatest when his faith in the risen Lord was greatest. The betrayal came when the European ceased to love his God with his whole heart and with his whole soul. When Christianity is seen as a cafeteria, where a person may take only what appeals to him and leave everything else, it becomes a demonic faith. Liberals worship Satan, not Christ, so they take an isolated part of Christianity and make it part of a satanic brew. Thus Christ’s call for salvation for all who believe is perverted into a satanic demand for one universal, godless race of bestial human beings. And such beasts do not care about just wars, sound economics, or the innocent unborn. That’s why Babylonian universalism is the first step on the road to Satania.
And now that there is only one road and that road leads to Satania, what is an antique European supposed to do? Should he just sign off? No, because the antique European was never on the road to Satania. The conservative-liberals should sign off; they’ve been working within Satania, accepting its basic premises, while trying to make slight alterations within the satanic household. The Christian European lives outside Satania; he is at war; he can’t sign off; he can only surrender, and that he refuses to do.
Adam and Eve broke their filial ties to God the Father because they thought Satan offered them something better. They were going to obtain forbidden knowledge that would make them the equal of God. We know how that turned out. The modern Europeans have repeated the original sin. They think they have obtained a knowledge greater than God’s, because God’s plan for man’s salvation was racist and provincial, but they have only rediscovered the plan of God’s ancient foe, the plan for the damnation of the human race. We have descended to such a low depth that we no longer have to use our imaginations to visualize hell; we can see it right in front of us in the black-infested urban centers of America and Europe and in the ruins of such countries as South Africa and Rhodesia.
The conservative-liberals always cry foul when the mad-dog liberals depict them as evil for voting Republican or for voting against amnesty. “Why demonize us; we just differ on the means to an end; we don’t differ on the end, which is democratic Babylon.”
The mad-dogs have grasped something that the pragmatic conservative-liberals have failed to grasp. It is a religious war; they should demonize their enemies. Where the mad-dogs err is in demonizing their fellow travelers, the conservative-liberals. The mad-dog liberal’s enemy is the white European. The conservative-liberal is sometimes mistaken for one, not by the white European, but by the mad-dog liberal.
The mad-dog liberals see that it is a religious war in which we are engaged. And it is we, the white Europeans, whom they want to eradicate from the face of the earth. Such satanic hatred is a fearful thing to face. But St. John tells us that “perfect love casteth out fear.” That is the trouble with the halfway house Christians and the conservative purveyors of statistical doom. They do not love the ancient Europeans and their civilization enough. They talk about church documents, the ‘born again’ experience, free markets, and some abstract concept of liberty that was supposedly invented by the Americans, but they don’t talk about old Europe and Europe’s people like Ratty talked about his river, with reverence, awe, and love:
`I beg your pardon,' said the Mole, pulling himself together with an effort. `You must think me very rude; but all this is so new to me. So--this--is--a--River!'It is by no means certain that the European will ever be a European again. It is certain, however, that if the European once again loves His Europe no force on earth will stand against him. +
`THE River,' corrected the Rat.
`And you really live by the river? What a jolly life!'
`By it and with it and on it and in it,' said the Rat. `It's brother and sister to me, and aunts, and company, and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It's my world, and I don't want any other. What it hasn't got is not worth having, and what it doesn't know is not worth knowing.