Cambria Will Not Yield

Saturday, May 29, 2010

The Day of Battle

True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart – a Goth.

– Thomas Nelson Page

I see that the World Cup is being held in South Africa. It wasn’t that long ago when no Western sporting event could be held in South Africa, but now that the white South Africans have seen the light and turned their country over to the colored gods, the white-hating countries of the West can play with the multi-racial people of South Africa. And even without the gift of prophecy or second sight, I can tell you how the Western media will cover the sporting event.

They will not show us the black barbarians in the midst of their daily activities, such as raping and murdering white people (remember, it is just a 'culture thing'), nor will they show us the breakdown of all civilized behavior throughout the once-civilized country of South Africa. What they will show us is a multi-racial South African football team that is a metaphor for the new South Africa. “Our racial diversity is our strength; you can see how wonderfully our people play together. Diversity works, on the playing field and in the work force.” We will also be treated to countless tributes to the late John Paul II’s favorite saint, Nelson Mandela.

Even if diversity meant what the liberals want people to think it means -- the coming together of all races, each respecting the other races while retaining their own distinct racial identities -- it would be wrong, wrong because God does not want another Tower of Babel. But diversity does not mean what the liberals say it means in theory; in practice, diversity means that the colored races, especially the black race, must be worshipped with the same love and reverence that used to be reserved for the Christ, the Son of the Living God. And the enemies of the new god are the non-believers, the white people who do not worship the black people. There are very few non-believers left in the European countries.

It is worth noting that the liberals, even before they ceased to believe in the divinity of Christ, lost their belief in original sin and in a personal devil who roams the world seeking the ruin of souls. Yet when the liberals constructed a new faith they incorporated a belief in original sin and the devil into their new doctrine. The original sin was committed by the white man – it was exploitation of the black – and the devil incarnate was the recalcitrant, unrepentant white man. It will always be thus. Christianity went deep into the soul of the European. Even when he renounces Christianity, his new faith mimics, in a perverted form, the old faith of the Europeans. There is still heaven – the future without white people; there is still hell – the European past; there is still a God – the black race; and there is still a devil – the white race.

The rock on which the black faith stands is the technology of the white man. Everything the white does in his new technological world is done to buttress up his god, the black man. And the end result of coupling the technological white to the black barbarian is a world that has not charity. The Christian European never succeeded in Christianizing the colored races, but he did, in whatever non-European country he entered, make the native colored aware that there was a God above the gods who demanded mercy and not sacrifice. The dictates of that God above the gods, the Europeans demanded, would be adhered to by all races whether they understood that God or not. Is it a better world now that we have not charity in it?

When Europeans were Christian, not halfway-house Christians but full flesh-and-blood, integral Christians, it was always the white man who opposed the savagery of the colored races, which was often a savagery one tribe inflicted on another. Now that the European has deified the savage and demonized the Christian European, there is no one to cry halt to the blood orgies of the colored people. The post-Christian white man not only refuses to stop the atrocities of the colored races, but he has also thrown his own form of technological savagery into the post-Christian, heathen stew. Words such as ‘choice’ and ‘collateral damage’ cover up the new technological slaughter of the innocents.

The European does not need, as the neo-pagans urge, to become a new man, an inhuman, sci-fi creature who rules the universe with his giant brain. Instead, he needs to recapture the heroic instinct which is the defining characteristic of the Christian European. The heroic European never aided and abetted heathenism, he destroyed it.

We are told there is no such thing as instinct; only animals have instinct. That is a devilish lie. Without instinct we are dead men. In the face of unspeakable evil, the instinctive reaction of the antique European was to oppose that evil, to fight to the last man, to never say die; deeper than reason, deeper than logic, was the instinct of the Christian European to defend his kith and kin against the onslaught of the barbarian hordes. Every European instinctively circled the wagons when the heathen approached. The unspeakably foul and degenerate world we live in today is the result of the European’s denial of the basic human instinct to defend his kith and kin.

There is no contradiction between the Christian precept of “love your enemies, do good to those who hate you” and the instinct to protect and defend one’s own. You cannot convert the heathen to a religion of charity by sacrificing your own people to the heathens. Nor can you convert the heathens by mixing with them. If the Christ-bearers become heathens, what is left to convert to?

The devil destroys souls by eliminating the channels of God’s grace. He convinced the European, through his mocking spokesmen such as Voltaire and Rousseau whose clones number in the millions throughout the modern world, that the European’s good instincts to defend and protect his own were evil, and that his cowardly and sinful capitulation to racial and sexual Babylon was good and noble. Satan’s appeal was to the utopian mind of the European, and he conjured up visions of “sweet perfumes of Arabia and Africa.” Christ’s appeal was and is to the heart. When the instincts of the heart die, so does faith die; the devil knows that, but the halfway-house Christians, the neo-pagans and the mad-dog liberals, who do the devil’s work, do not know it. “For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.”

The Germanic people who accepted Christ understood with their hearts. It was no coincidence that the Germanic people, who understood the God of mercy and rejected the gods of sacrifice, had at the time of their conversion a passionate attachment to their own kith and kin. They were close to the things of the hearth, which is where the heart learns to understand existence. The colored tribes never fully understood the Christian faith, because they never valued the hearth fire as much as they valued the sacrificial fire. And the Greek and Roman philosophers never converted, because they didn’t want to fooled by a Jewish carpenter.

The last battle has begun. All faithful Europeans are Germans no matter what their ethnic tinge. The liberals have joined their decadent Greek minds with the body of the Negro to create a hideous monstrosity, a kind of black and white Übermensch. The neo-pagan who worships his own mind and only his own mind will be of no use in the great battle, because he has cut himself off from the European past. By doing so he has killed his heart, and consequently he understands nothing.

There is no mercy or pity in the black and white Übermensch. He represents the atheistic, philosophical tradition of the white man and the bloody, merciless, superficial faith of the barbarian. Religious zeal – and the liberal does regard the anti-European battle as a religious war – at the service of a merciless faith is horrific. Against such zeal the white man is defenseless unless he counters the liberals’ religious zeal and the barbarians’ blood lust with the instinctual, blood faith of the antique European. Love of the European hearth and the God of that hearth inspired the ancient European in the day of battle, and it will sustain the modern “against the world” Europeans in their day of battle. +

Labels: ,

Saturday, May 22, 2010

The Modern Fairy Tale

The difference between the two systems was that one was formed and officered by sutlers and camp-followers and former slaves, while the other was composed of men who had achieved military honors and were impelled by the love of home, the pride of ancestry, and the desire to save the civilization they had inherited. – The Red Riders by Thomas Nelson Page

A few days ago on the news I saw a Negro ballplayer, a Negro singer, and the lesbian tennis player, Billie Jean King, appear together before a sporting event to celebrate the so-called “Civil Rights Game Weekend.” The juxtaposition was quite apropos; civil rights mean race-mixing, feminism, and homosexuality.

“Civil rights” is a ‘god term’ to liberals. A man at a gathering of liberals bows slightly and with a reverent voice says: “That man over there, the liberal in the corner, marched in the great civil rights marches of the 1960’s.” Then the ancient liberal comes across the room and tells the young people at the party a modern fairy tale.
* * *

“There was once a time when black and white lived apart. White people lived in sumptuous palaces while black people, who did all the work, were forced to live in shacks, shanties, and ghettos. Then little by little some very great white people (the ancient liberal doesn’t say he was one of them, but the admiring throng all know he was) realized just how wonderful black people really were and just how evil white people were. These great white people then joined hands with the wonderful black people and demanded that the bad white people give the black people “civil rights.” But the very great white people – they are called ‘liberals’ – did not stop with civil rights for black people; they fought and won civil rights for your funny looking Uncle Charlie who spends so much time in public restrooms and for your cousin Angie who went to the prom with her girlfriend. Yes, my children, civil rights are a wonderful thing, but they had to be fought for.

“Once, down in a terrible place called the South, a U. S. President had to send federal troops so that a poor little black girl could attend a school the bad white people had forbidden her to attend.”

“Were white people really that bad back then?” asked 10-year-old Kathy.

“Yes,” says the ancient liberal, “they were that bad, and they were even worse than that. The same bad men from the same bad place, the South, used to go to Africa, run into the Africans' homes, kidnap the Africans, and then take them to the South, chain them in dungeons, and beat them all the time until they died.”

“Really?” says the wide-eyed 11-year-old Tommy.

“Yes, Tommy, really. Even after a big war was fought to take the good and wonderful black men out of the white dungeons and away from their life in chains, evil white men would hang them every time they tried to go on a bus or eat in a restaurant where there were white people. And still to this day there are more bad white people than good ones.”

“Are there any bad black people?”

The ancient liberal looks at the questioner with unfeigned shock. “Of course not, Tommy. There are no bad black people.”

“But,” Tommy persists, “I’ve heard of some bad black people my father...”

“No, Tommy, that is wrong. And if your father said that, he is wrong. Sometimes it seems like black people do bad things, but it always turns out that the bad things are not really bad things; they are black culture things, which are good things.”

“What if white people do black culture things?”

“Then Tommy, the white people are very, very bad. Do you understand, Tommy? It’s important that you understand this concept.”

“I think I understand. White people are bad, no matter what they do, and black people are good despite all the bad they do. Because the bad they do is not really bad even though it would be bad if white people did it.”

“Excellent! You’ve grasped the concept. You know, Tommy, many older white people cannot understand what you have come to understand.”

Tommy beams. “I always try to learn my lessons.”

Practical Kathy then asks, “What can I do to help the black people?”

“Well, Kathy, there are many things you can do, but the most important thing you can do (I’m sure you’ve covered this in your sex ed classes) is to have sexual intercourse with black men.”

“Should I start now?”

“No, I think you should wait until you’re fourteen. Until that time you can worship black men at your local church and give part of your allowance to help the earthquake victims in Haiti.”

“I will do all that, Father... Oh, excuse me, you’re not a priest.”


* * *

When the liberals tell us the Grimm’s fairy tales are too violent and too moralistic, what they really mean is the Grimm’s fairy tales are too Christian in their ethos. In the Grimm's tales the good prevail over the wicked and the wicked people do the type of thing, such as betray their own kith and kin and support perversion, which modern liberals now do under the guise of virtuous behavior. Black is now white because vice has become virtue.

All societies have fairy tales which reflect their religious faith. I’ve just outlined the typical fairy story that the liberals have been telling white children for the past fifty years. Are there any whites left who believe in the fairy stories (the ones without modern public bathroom fairies) told by the antique Europeans?

Violence is truly a terrible thing, and only the savage worships blood lust. But is it possible to reclaim a heritage taken from us at the point of bayonets and to defend our people against the violent onslaught of savage barbarians by peaceful means? I know of no time in history when that which was taken away by force was not reclaimed by force. And I know of no other defense against violence except violence.

The conservative-liberal doesn’t believe a nation is built by people of the same faith and of the same blood. But you can’t have a nation without a people, and there can be no such thing as a people without a common faith and a common race. The conservative-liberal will never fight for the European people or for the Christian faith because his nation, the nation he will fight for, is a utopian, multi-racial nation. But this nation is not a reality; it is a fantasy, a fantasy like pure democracy or communism. And the fantasy is a succubus, which feeds on the life blood of the European, leaving him a bloodless, lifeless corpse.

The religious counterpart of the conservative-liberal is the halfway-house Christian. No matter which white church you turn to, you’ll find the people there united in their abiding faith in the goodness of the black man and the evil of the white man. (1)

The whites attending these churches do so because they need a faith. And since the liberals will not allow the Europeans to worship the Christian God, the God of spirit and blood, the modern Europeans worship the great black god instead. They may incorporate some old Christian hymns and some Christian phrases into their worship services, but at the heart of their worship is a celebration of the dark night of Babylon.

The shift from the worship of Christ and the support of the Christian European hearth, to the worship of the black man and the intense desire to eradicate the Christian European hearth was a gradual sea change. The change stemmed from a fear of marginalization, the loss of jobs, and in some circumstances, martyrdom. As the liberals gained ascendance and made the black faith the state faith, the Christian churches had to make a choice. They could keep their buildings and some kind of nominal faith in the cosmic, Coke-commercial Christ if they made the worship of the black man the central tenet of their faith. Or they could stay with the Christ of old Europe and suffer the consequences. They choose the former.

There doesn’t seem to be any hopeful signs when we look at modern Europe. But if we look at the Europeans’ past history, it becomes very difficult to believe that the European will remain content with the worship of the Negro and all the perverted practices that go with Negro worship. Evil, in the final analysis, is very superficial. The unredeemed Dr. Faustus is a bore.

Superficial and boring as it is, Negro worship is the new faith of the European. It is in direct opposition to the Christian faith of the pre-20th century European. And there can be no peaceful co-existence between the two faiths; one must prevail over the other. Black-worshipping Europeans can co-exist with Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims and every other religious sect, but they cannot co-exist with European Christians for the simple reason that Satan’s minions and the followers of Christ will always be at war.

War is a terrible thing, but surrender to Satan’s minions is blasphemy. That is why the European is currently at war with his own nation and with every surrounding nation. Contra Mundum. +
(1) Instead of placing signs outside of their churches that have the word Christian or Catholic in their titles the modern churches should make their signs coincide with their faith. The signs outside should read – “The New Ecumenical Church of White Genocide” or “The Roman Rite, Black Worshipping Church of the New Millennium” Just a few sample slogans that I hope, for the sake of clarity, the formerly Christian Churches will adopt.

Labels: , ,

Saturday, May 15, 2010

The Fearful Dark Night of Europe

And hope is brightest when it dawns from fears
-- Scott

Paul Craig Roberts, who writes insightful articles on the subject of economics, recently wrote his final column, titled “Truth Has Fallen and Taken Liberty With It.”
For the last six years I have been banned from the ‘mainstream media.’ My last column in the New York Times appeared in January, 2004, coauthored with Democratic U. S. Senator Charles Schumer representing New York. We addressed the offshoring of U. S. Jobs. Our op-ed article produced a conference at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D. C. and live coverage by C-Span. A debate was launched. No such thing could happen today.

For years I was a mainstay at the Washington Times, producing credibility for the Moonie newspaper as a Business Week columnist, former Wall Street Journal editor, and former Assistant Secretary of the U. S. Treasury. But when I began criticizing Bush’s wars of aggression, the order came down to Mary Lou Forbes to cancel my column.

The American corporate media does not serve the truth. It serves the government and the interest groups that empower the government...

The militarism of the U. S. and Israeli states, and Wall Street and corporate greed, will now run their course. As the pen is censored and its might extinguished, I am signing off.
Roberts was absolutely correct in his criticism of Bush’s wars of aggression, but I wonder where he has been living for the last forty years if he thinks it is only in the last six years that speaking the truth has been forbidden. The liberals have become more draconian now that their power is total, but long before Paul Craig Roberts was banned from the mainstream media the truth was banned. If Mr. Roberts had tried, from the 1960’s onward, to write articles in defense of segregation and against race-mixing, he would have found his articles banned from the mainstream media. Truth be told when conservatives agreed to go along with the race-mixing movement, called the ‘civil rights’ movement, they were doomed to lose on every other issue, such as legalized abortion, economics, and war.

If you look at the world from an antique European perspective, it is perfectly clear why the white man’s refusal to defend his race led to legalized abortions, wars of aggression, and unsound economic policies. Outside of Christian Europe was there ever a nation concerned with the proper ordering of their economy, the justice of their wars, or the plight of the defenseless baby in the womb? If Paul Craig Roberts had had the same respect for the truth that race-mixing leads to the destruction of white civilization as he had for the truth that bad wars and bad economics equal disaster, he might have foreseen that the same people who deny the sinfulness and folly of race-mixing are the same people who are going to deny the truth of Paul Craig Roberts’ criticism of wars of aggression and unsound economic policies. Old Neville Chamberlain’s name has become synonymous with cowardly appeasement, but where is the greater appeasement to be found? At least Chamberlain sold out to other white people. Our modern liberals and their scared-rabbit 'Christian' lackeys sold out their own people to the colored barbarians.

It’s a question of “when our grace we have once forgot.” Once a man makes the first betrayal, the betrayal of his race, the second, third, and fourth betrayals will follow. One man might show more concern for the abortion betrayal, another for the economic betrayal, but every subsequent betrayal stems from the white man’s initial betrayal of his race.

The neo-pagans tell us that Christianity is responsible for the great betrayal, but that view contradicts the historical evidence. The white man’s love for his race was greatest when his faith in the risen Lord was greatest. The betrayal came when the European ceased to love his God with his whole heart and with his whole soul. When Christianity is seen as a cafeteria, where a person may take only what appeals to him and leave everything else, it becomes a demonic faith. Liberals worship Satan, not Christ, so they take an isolated part of Christianity and make it part of a satanic brew. Thus Christ’s call for salvation for all who believe is perverted into a satanic demand for one universal, godless race of bestial human beings. And such beasts do not care about just wars, sound economics, or the innocent unborn. That’s why Babylonian universalism is the first step on the road to Satania.

And now that there is only one road and that road leads to Satania, what is an antique European supposed to do? Should he just sign off? No, because the antique European was never on the road to Satania. The conservative-liberals should sign off; they’ve been working within Satania, accepting its basic premises, while trying to make slight alterations within the satanic household. The Christian European lives outside Satania; he is at war; he can’t sign off; he can only surrender, and that he refuses to do.

Adam and Eve broke their filial ties to God the Father because they thought Satan offered them something better. They were going to obtain forbidden knowledge that would make them the equal of God. We know how that turned out. The modern Europeans have repeated the original sin. They think they have obtained a knowledge greater than God’s, because God’s plan for man’s salvation was racist and provincial, but they have only rediscovered the plan of God’s ancient foe, the plan for the damnation of the human race. We have descended to such a low depth that we no longer have to use our imaginations to visualize hell; we can see it right in front of us in the black-infested urban centers of America and Europe and in the ruins of such countries as South Africa and Rhodesia.

The conservative-liberals always cry foul when the mad-dog liberals depict them as evil for voting Republican or for voting against amnesty. “Why demonize us; we just differ on the means to an end; we don’t differ on the end, which is democratic Babylon.”

The mad-dogs have grasped something that the pragmatic conservative-liberals have failed to grasp. It is a religious war; they should demonize their enemies. Where the mad-dogs err is in demonizing their fellow travelers, the conservative-liberals. The mad-dog liberal’s enemy is the white European. The conservative-liberal is sometimes mistaken for one, not by the white European, but by the mad-dog liberal.

The mad-dog liberals see that it is a religious war in which we are engaged. And it is we, the white Europeans, whom they want to eradicate from the face of the earth. Such satanic hatred is a fearful thing to face. But St. John tells us that “perfect love casteth out fear.” That is the trouble with the halfway house Christians and the conservative purveyors of statistical doom. They do not love the ancient Europeans and their civilization enough. They talk about church documents, the ‘born again’ experience, free markets, and some abstract concept of liberty that was supposedly invented by the Americans, but they don’t talk about old Europe and Europe’s people like Ratty talked about his river, with reverence, awe, and love:
`I beg your pardon,' said the Mole, pulling himself together with an effort. `You must think me very rude; but all this is so new to me. So--this--is--a--River!'

`THE River,' corrected the Rat.

`And you really live by the river? What a jolly life!'

`By it and with it and on it and in it,' said the Rat. `It's brother and sister to me, and aunts, and company, and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It's my world, and I don't want any other. What it hasn't got is not worth having, and what it doesn't know is not worth knowing.
It is by no means certain that the European will ever be a European again. It is certain, however, that if the European once again loves His Europe no force on earth will stand against him. +

Labels: ,

Saturday, May 08, 2010

Where the Battle is Raging

“Kill thy physician and thy fee bestow upon the foul disease.” – King Lear

Elizabeth Rundle Charles is another one of those authors from the golden age of Queen Victoria’s Britain. In her work on Martin Luther and the Reformation, titled The Chronicles of the Schönberg-Cotta Family, she has this to say about a Christian soldier’s responsibilities.
It is the truth which is assailed in any age which tests our fidelity. It is to confess we are called, not merely to profess. If I profess, with the loudest voice and the clearest exposition, every portion of the truth of God except precisely that little point which the world and the devil are at that moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Christianity. Where the battle rages the loyalty of the soldier is proved; and to be steady on all the battlefields besides is mere flight and disgrace to him if he flinches at that one point.
Amen to that.

The liberals are consistent; they started the attack on God by race-mixing, and they have continued down (they of course claim it is an ascent) the slippery slope of feminism, legalized abortion, and homosexual marriage. The half-way house Christians are not as consistent as the liberals; they only want to go a little way down the slope. Like the virtuous pagans in Dante’s Inferno, the halfway-house Christians are content with the first circle of hell. Such Christians will probably remain in the first circle of hell their entire lives. They will make good dinner companions and be fine, upstanding citizens who will not double-park or cheat on their taxes, but they will be of no use in the war against liberalism. In fact they will side with the liberals against the Europeans of the old stock. Instead of repulsing the enemy’s assault on the white European wall, they will be at the breach in the wall, helping the enemy widen it to become a main entrance into the fort. And the second generation halfway-house Christians, having witnessed their parents’ capitulation to liberaldom on the racial issue, will become consistent liberals and accept the proper liberal view of homosexual marriage, feminism, and legalized abortion.

Twice a year I read through Shakespeare’s King Lear with my children. And every time I read the play I feel transported outside of space and time to a deeper, more spiritual world, His world. If the ‘one world, one race’ purveyors of racial and sexual Babylon have their way, there will be no connection between heaven and earth. The antique Europeans, the first fully human race of people, built a bridge from their world to His world. When that race of people and their cultural heritage are destroyed, the earth will once again be one formless mass of crawling creatures without any knowledge of the spirit that is in man or of the God who became man. The battle for Europe and the battle for Christianity are one and the same.

The saddest thing for me to witness is the spectacle of halfway-house Christians struggling to keep their faith alive while doing everything possible to sever their blood ties to European Christianity. A case in point: I recently, with my sons, helped a small group of fundamentalists move from one church, where they could no longer afford the rent, to another church with lower rent. I helped with the move mainly because I felt sorry for one of the elderly ladies in the congregation, whom I knew would wither and die without ‘her church.’ But sad to say the good Christian woman and the rest of the largely elderly church members all believed without question that the extinction of “European Christianity” is mandated by the same Holy Scriptures that their European ancestors used to read and revere.

Of course everything is worse in the mainstream “Christian churches.” Those beautiful structures built with such love by Europeans many years ago are now citadels of abomination. Hatred for the European Christian heritage is preached with satanic fervor. And the halfway-house Christians, who go to basement churches rather than accept homosexual ministers and legalized abortion, join in the chorus every time the mad-dogs demand the extermination of everything European. In fact, the halfway-house Christians, including my kindly elderly lady friend, will help the mad-dog liberals light the bonfire that extinguishes the last relics of European Christianity.

Throughout the European world the notion that the truth about God and existence can only be known through the human mind has become an unchallenged assumption. Such an assumption is in direct contrast to the traditional beliefs of the Christian Europeans. The Europeans believed wisdom came through the blood. Their God entered the bloodstream of humanity and they kept the knowledge of God in their hearts. The Christian church does not consist of those people who give their assent to a philosophical system that contains Christ somewhere in the midst of the system. The Christian church consists of those Christians who have a blood faith, the type of faith that the Hebrew prophets, St. Paul and the older Europeans had.

Today only the colored hordes have a blood faith. And tragically theirs is not a blood faith in Jesus Christ. Against the barbarians’ blood faith, the European is helpless because he has no true faith; he has only a philosophical system. If the European would return to the Christianity that entered the bloodstream of the European so many years ago, he would once again conquer the world for Christ. But as things stand now the modern Europeans will continue to worship the barbarians of color. Having forsaken their blood faith they must embrace a faith that combines the mind of the decadent white with the blood of the savage. Such a marriage has brought the world to ruin.

“He who endures to the end will be saved.” And Edgar in Shakespeare’s King Lear echoes our Lord’s words: “Men must endure their going hence even as they are coming hither. Ripeness is all.” The liberals and barbarians have shown their satanic colors, and the halfway-house Christians have forsaken their blood faith for what they think is a better, purer faith. They ultimately will join with the barbarians and the liberals. We have no strategic plan, no magic talisman which we can use against the triumvirate of satanic liberals, barbarians, and halfway-house Christians. That doesn’t matter; we don’t need a strategy or a magic talisman. We have not forsaken our blood, and the ancient wisdom of our race tells us that we shall conquer because we shall endure to the end, faithful to our blood and the God of our blood.

There is a wonderful white moment in John Ford’s Western The Searchers. The main character, played by John Wayne, of course, has been tracking a band of Comanche Indians in order to rescue his niece who was taken captive. When one member of the rescue party says it’s hopeless, John Wayne’s character replies: “An Indian will chase a thing until he figures he has chased it enough and then he’ll give up. Same thing when he’s running. Seems like he never learns there is a certain type of critter that just won’t give up. We’ll find her, sure as the turning of the earth.” That moment in Ford’s film encapsulates for me the heart and soul of the white man. The white man has His image in his blood, and when he fights for kith and kin against the blood lust of the barbarians, the Europeans’ victory is as sure as the turning of the earth. And what is proof to me that the modern, halfway-house Christians in their hearts have gone over to the liberals is their lack of righteous anger against the barbarians and liberals who attack and defile the European heritage and the European people. Where is the passion to punish home, to rip the heart out of the enemy who preys on the innocent and would destroy everything that is white and Christian? The white Christian is not different from the barbarian because he never becomes angry, or passionate, or violent. He differs from the barbarian in what he becomes angry, passionate, and violent about. The antique white man’s passion was linked to Christ’s passion. Our ancient civilization was created by the blending of the two passions. The remnant band of Europeans, who still have the passion in their blood which comes from an intimate connection with the God-Man, must endure their going hence even as He is coming hither. +

Labels: ,

Saturday, May 01, 2010

The Lifeblood of the European

“The Christ story, the Hebraic Fairy Tale, is the story that the Europeans took to their hearts. Burn every single cathedral, church, and art work that celebrates the Christ story and you still won’t eradicate the sacred remembrances of Christ that lives in the blood of the European. There will always be some Europeans that will never let go of the European past. Against all logic, against all practicality, a certain breed of men will simply not let go of the vision of the one true God, who lives and reigns in eternal Europe.” -- CWNY

In the last five years I’ve done some “reaching out” in order to ascertain whether I could work with pro-white neo-pagans despite our disagreement on the issue of Christianity. I’ve also tried to ascertain whether I could work with professed Christians despite our disagreement on the subject of race. I discovered that I could not work with either the neo-pagans or the professed Christians. Both groups seemed, for different reasons, to be against the Christianity that was the lifeblood of the European for hundreds of years prior to the 20th century.

First let’s look at the neo-pagans. The older neo-pagans such as John Tyndall and Samuel Francis were politer than the younger, more savage breed of neo-pagans, but the old guard neo-pagans were united with the new neo-pagans in their firm belief that Christ be not risen. To the old guard neo-pagan, European Christianity was a wonderful invention of the white man which had been good for a time, but which became a destructive force when it went back to its non-European origins. It was not, the old guard neo-pagans maintained, Christianity that made Europe great; it was the Europeans who had made Christianity great.

The younger neo-pagans are less articulate. Their common refrain was and is, “Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew,” which is a curious phenomenon. The young neo-pagans profess to despise the Jews, yet they are like unto the Jews. The Jews, like the neo-pagans, have a passionate hatred for Christianity. Both think Christianity has been bad for their people. And of course both groups are wrong; Christ is the only hope for their people.

Even if the modern professed Christians were correct in their assertion that Christianity and white genocide are synonymous, it would be rather penny-wise, pound-foolish to abandon the hope for personal salvation for a generic hope in the survival of the white race here on earth. To what end does mere survival lead? It leads to a universal bone yard where there is no white or black, Jew or Christian, male or female, only bones. In the Kingdom of Heaven, which the neo-pagans reject, there are distinctions between black and white, male and female, sinner and saint. Neo-paganism is a blasphemy wedded to an absurdity.

In his eschatology the modern professed Christian is linked to the neo-pagan and the Jew. All three look for the future to bring about a new millennium. The neo-pagan looks to the future in which the white Übermensch, who has gone beyond good and evil, controls the world; the Jew looks for the King who will restore the house of Israel; and the modern professed Christian looks to a future age when Christians, who have freed Christ from His European prison, will worship the true Christ.

There are subtle differences between the three groups. The neo-pagans’ savior is non-personal; they simply believe in the generic race. The Jews’ savior is yet to come. Only the modern professed Christians have a savior who has already entered historical time. But has he? The Christian faith that is professed in the modern churches is not the European Christianity which, contra the neo-pagans, was the Christianity of the Bible; it is a new, syncretistic Christianity in which Christ is one God among some equal and some greater gods. And the new Christ is not a God who entered historical time; He is a cosmic God who stands outside of time as the symbol of the divine logos or the “best that is in man.” The break with the historical Christ, with Jesus of Nazareth, took place when the lunatic fringe, the great haters such as Rousseau, Voltaire, and a rogue’s gallery of Rosicrucians, alchemists, and rationalists, convinced the Christian Europeans that faith in Jesus was crude and simplistic while faith in the cosmic Messiah was important and grandiose.

Once the mindset that the traditional European Christianity is backward and retrograde takes hold, the modern Christian, even if he professes to believe in the major tenets of Christianity, will always act in accord with the liberal Christ haters. Which is why we see the strange phenomenon of “conservative” churches screaming just as loudly for race-mixing and democracy as the liberals. To oppose either would be reactionary, and therefore un-Christian, because Christianity is about the future, the new millennium. Witness the lunatic Christian evangelicals who want Israel to start a holy war in the Mideast in order to hasten the return of the liberal Christ who will punish all racists and non-supporters of Israel.

We must make a distinction between the older European Christianity and the new Christianity. The old faith was a faith for men and women who had that within which passeth show. The cruel barbarian gods of sacrifice, the distant gods of Mt. Olympus, and the abstract god of the philosophers were not enough for the race of people who needed to know that there was someone beyond and above the pagan’s isle of the dead who cared about them on this earth and in the world beyond.

The modern churches are built on stony rocks and thorns. The seeds of faith cannot take root and grow in those churches. The older European faith was rooted in the good soil, which was love of kith and kin; from such a soil, faith in the divinely human heart of Christ was born.

There has never been, nor will there ever be, a deep Faith in the living God without the fire that can only be kindled by the bonds human beings form with their kith and kin. The conservative Christian sects that admirably profess to hold to the inerrancy of Holy Scripture are not being true to their stated faith when they seek to make the human race generic. God divided humanity into particulars in order that we might come to know the particular, personal God who came from a race of people, not from a multi-racial, ecumenical cabal or from the mind of a philosopher.

The ‘Scripture alone’ Protestants were right to rebel against the ‘Reason alone’ scholastics, but have you eliminated human reason as your guide to faith and replaced it with the Holy Scriptures if human reason is your guide to the Holy Scriptures? How can a man test the veracity of the Christ story as found in the Bible or as presented to him by the teachings of the Catholic Magisterium? There is only one sifting ground for truth – the human heart. We believe or disbelieve in a visionary revelation depending on just how deeply the vision stirs our hearts.
‘Tis still a dream, or else such stuff as madmen
Tongue and brain not; either both or nothing;
Or senseless speaking, or a speaking such
As sense cannot untie. Be what it is,
The action of my life is like it, which
I’ll keep, if but for sympathy.
Let me refer back to a community Bible class I attended as part of my outreach to find other believing Christians. In reading through the Bible with the class, I was immensely impressed by the thematic synergy between the Bible and the works of the European poets. But every time I pointed out the magnificent synergy, the Bible-believing Christians looked at me as if I were from the planet Mars. These same Bible-believing Christians were also doctrinally opposed to segregation and enthusiastic supporters of one race, one world Christianity.

There is a disconnect between the Christian European of one hundred years ago and the modern professed Christian. The antique European saw no contradiction between a God who calls all men to salvation and a God who makes and wills distinctions between particular races and particular individuals. But the modern professed Christian, who has abandoned the bardic faith of his ancestors, is not capable of understanding God, because he has lost, through willful pride of intellect, the blood wisdom of the bardic European. The modern Christian’s understanding is limited to reason alone, which is always an imperfect guide to existence. If the neo-pagan were a genuine Roman pagan, he would be closer to Christ than a modern Christian because the ancient pagan had respect for the eternal verities; he was not impious.

The Holy Scriptures and an organized church cannot sustain a vital faith in Christ if they are seen as something separate and above the traditional, communal life of a people. Our culture is in our blood. The faith must be planted in the blood if it is to take root and grow.

And therein lies the reason a Christian European of the old school finds he can’t work with the modern professed Christians or with the neo-pagans. To support either will lead to the extinction of the white race and the traditional Christian faith of the white race. Our blood faith is The Faith; if we forsake our blood we have nothing and we will return to nothingness. +

Labels: , ,